Analysis of ASCON Lightweight Authenticated Encryption for UAV Surveillance Communication Security

Authors

  • Vedaniar Zahra Danardini Mulia Politeknik Siber dan Sandi Negara
  • Rizal Amrullah Politeknik Siber dan Sandi Negara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70710/sitj.v3i2.102

Keywords:

AEAD, ASCON, Authenticated Encryption, Cybersecurity, Drone Communication Security, Lightweight Cryptography, Surveillance Communication, UAV Security

Abstract

The advancement of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology has brought attention to the necessity of secure communication in intelligence and surveillance missions. UAV systems are susceptible to a number of cybersecurity threats since they depend on wireless communication, including eavesdropping, spoofing, replay attacks, telemetry manipulation, and hijacking. Although traditional cryptography techniques offer robust security, their high computational and energy costs render them unsuitable for the limited capabilities of UAVs. This study employs a comparative literature assessment of papers published between 2021 and 2026 to analyse ASCON lightweight cryptography as a potential solution for secure UAV surveillance communications. Confidentiality, integrity verification, authentication capabilities, and overall computational and energy efficiency against significant threats are important factors evaluated. The results demonstrate how effectively ASCON supports Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD), which provides total security for confidentiality, integrity, and authentication while consuming little energy and computing resources. Additionally, ASCON is more resilient to spoofing and replay attacks than other conventional and lightweight cryptographic methods. This study highlights ASCON's capabilities in limited operating conditions and promotes the use of lightweight authenticated encryption algorithms in future UAV cybersecurity frameworks and embedded surveillance systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., Hashem, I. A. T., & Alotaibi, F. (2017). Internet of Things security: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 88, 10–28.

Dobraunig, C., Eichlseder, M., Mendel, F., & Schläffer, M. (2021). Ascon v1.2: Lightweight authenticated encryption and hashing. Journal of Cryptology, 34(3), 1–42.

Sabuwala, Noshin & Daruwala, Rohin. (2023). Drones: Architecture, Vulnerabilities, Attacks and Countermeasures. 10.1007/978-3-031-31164-2_18.

Turan, M. S., Mckay, K. A., Chang, D., Kang, J., & Kelsey, J. (2025). Ascon-Based Lightweight

Cryptography Standards for Constrained Devices. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

Roman, R., Lopez, J., & Mambo, M. (2016). Mobile edge computing, fog computing and lightweight cryptography for IoT and UAV systems: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 680–698.

Singh, P., Sharma, V., & Kim, J. (2024). Cybersecurity threats and countermeasures in UAV communication systems: A survey. IEEE Access, 12, 33415–33439.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Wang, L., Chen, Y., Wang, P., & Yan, Z. (2021). Security threats and countermeasures of unmanned aerial vehicle communications. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 5(4), 41–47.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Mulia, V. Z. D., & Amrullah, R. (2026). Analysis of ASCON Lightweight Authenticated Encryption for UAV Surveillance Communication Security . Security Intelligence Terrorism Journal (SITJ), 3(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.70710/sitj.v3i2.102

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.